Archive for the 'Democrats' Category

Unprincipled Endorsement

Friday, October 31st, 2008

Michael Moore made an idiot out of himself on “Democracy Now!” this morning. He endorsed Obama and then proceeded to differ with the candidate on the critical issues of war, health care, and the economy. Moore says he’s hoping Obama will violate his promise to strengthen the US military presence in Afghanistan, that he’ll withdraw his support for the continuation of private health insurance, and that he’ll repudiate his own vote in favor of the bank bailout. Good luck with that, Mike! Amy Goodman didn’t ask Moore whether this betrayal of his own publicly-expressed principles is permanent or just for the election.  

Congress to Legalize Bank Robbery

Friday, October 3rd, 2008

Bank robbery, generally understood as a crime committed against the banker, takes on new meaning under the legislation that is expected to pass the House today. The bill allows bankers to rob the national treasury to make up for gambling losses incurred by a few of them over the last couple of years.

The bank thugs didn’t hold a gun to the Congress, but they did the next best thing. They threatened the government of the United States with the immediate termination of further credit if the people failed to fork over a sum equal to the yearly earnings of 30 million workers. Just as a kidnaper cuts off his victim’s finger and sends it to the anxious relatives, the bankers cut off the credit of small business first, to show they’re serious.

Our leaders like to say that they don’t negotiate with terrorists, and they didn’t negotiate in this case. They simply agreed to pay the ransom. As often happens in such cases, capitulation is no guarantee that the bankers will liberate our abducted economy, and my congressman John Larson, who voted to pay the terrorists, shouldn’t be surprised to find the economy decomposing in a shallow grave soon after the election.

Larson Explains Bailout Vote

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008

My opponent Congressman John Larson and a panel of influential local Democrats gave ten good reasons yesterday not to bail out bankrupt bankers and then pleaded for public support to do just that.

They held the floor for over an hour and left the public a half-hour to ask questions. It was clear from their talk that:

There is no panic except among bankers
The bailout (Larson prefers “rescue) isn’t paid for
The people are against it
It regulates nothing
The political process of enacting it is corrupt
It might not work, and, even if does, we’ll have to cough up more later
It’s still a blank check for Bush
It was arranged in haste and poorly thought-out
Huge amounts of money will flow out of this country
Congress is incompetent to handle economic issues, and this is probably not the best solution

The reasons for enacting the bailout—Larson believes that it didn’t pass because we called it a bailout instead of a rescue—are one: we’re scared. It’s a crisis, and we must act, says John Larson. Do something! Anything! Throw money!

When Larson was challenged to explain why he let this happen, he had, as always, “blame to go around.” His defense is based on his own weakness and the utter corruption of the body—the greatest government on earth, by consensus of opinion—in which he serves.

Larson’s argument is that it’s impossible to act in the public interest because members of the other party oppose it. He’s saying, first, that the positions of his adversaries are fixed and immutable and that he hasn’t the strength of character to persuade any of them of anything. He’s acknowledging that as a leader, with the power to sway public opinion and public policy, he is an utter failure. And as he confesses the weakness of his own advocacy, he maligns the House of Representatives as incapable, without supermajorities, of doing the right thing. Crap!

John Larson fails to carry out the will of the people because it conflicts with the will of his owners, expressed through the leaders of his elite club, Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel, Barney Frank, and company, along with their cronies in the other party and in the Senate and White House. It’s Larson and Bush against us on this issue.

Bluff Called

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

The American people went up against some high-rollers in a table-stakes showdown yesterday, and the professional gamblers blinked. The people had to call their bluff, because the people are the only ones holding any high cards in this game. We have a vote, and we can close down the table.

It’s the Rumplestiltskin story on a grand scale. The maid pledged her first-born to a troll in exchange for the ability to spin gold from straw. That’s what Wall Street’s been doing, spinning gold from straw, on the pledge of the US government to mortgage our kids and grandkids. Except that the people wouldn’t go along.

In the first place, the people don’t trust Rumplestiltskin with their kids’ money. The people are aware that Bush, Paulson, and their cronies in Congress have been running a scam. Nobody says exactly what this money is for. Nobody says where this money is coming from. When the people try to find out, through their trusted news-suppliers, where the heck the billions are going, the policy-makers leave the room. Would you pledge your first-born to people who refuse to answer questions?

To say that bailout proponents are a collection of cynics would be an understatement. On the Democrat side, they allowed more than a third of their majority to vote against the bill–mostly, incumbents who face tough election contests–believing they could pass it easily with the help of those notorious agents of greed, the Republicans. But there weren’t enough “safe” Republicans to risk a vote for blackmail. It wasn’t principle that won the day for the people, but stark terror.

It’s no exaggeration to say that Congress, in giving the Bush plan any serious consideration at all, exposed itself as an assembly of thugs and enablers. The gamblers in banking and real estate bid up prices on everything with easy credit, pocketed the profits and commissions, and put housing and a decent quality of life out of reach of half the population. Now their equity is being devalued, as prices begin to retreat to within the range of ordinary people, and they want government to make up their losses. Only a corrupt government would do such a thing. They made their buck on the inflation of the bubble, and now they expect to be compensated because it busted?

Voters also noticed that in the “legislation” proposed by the Bush/Frank/Paulson cabal there was no provision for the raising of the money. They were just going to spend it, and they never said where they were getting it from. That’s dishonest, and the people saw through it.

How would the people have reacted if Barney Frank had written a bill that called for a one-time property tax levy, graduated, on owners of more than five million, to put the banks back on their feet? The people would have applauded, but Frank didn’t propose such a tax. In fact, nobody proposed anything except the blank-check approach. No government subsidies for college loans and small business loans. No direct assistance to mortgage debtors. No rent subsidies for displaced tenants and homeowners. No public works. Nothing but the Bush plan, slightly revised. People aren’t stupid enough to accept the first solution offered to a problem as complicated as this one, especially from people they don’t trust who have lied to them before.

As low as members of Congress score on the public trust scale, the news media rank lower. News-consumers must have noticed the dismay on the faces of the TV people–their cooperation in sowing panic has been a mainstay of this blackmail attempt–as Dow Jones declined ever so moderately (much less than the gains that brought it to its current overpriced level) and didn’t crash. There was panic among the news-mongers that there was no panic. Bluff called.

Will there be a depression? Of course commerce will slow down. That was already happening. A bailout might have postponed the reckoning until after election day, but when you spend what you don’t have, you eventually have to pay up. As individuals, we borrowed to eat and work. As a nation, we borrowed to enable our leaders to loot, waste and ravage. The bill is coming due.

As it turns out, the creditors, who said they wouldn’t lend without this payment, stand to lose more by burying their money than by lending it, and so the credit markets continue to function. It might become harder to borrow, but for the vast majority of Americans, blacklisted or about to be blacklisted by credit rating bureaus, it will be no less impossible than it is now. Let this bailout die, and let’s oust this racketeering outfit that used to be our government before we allow them to dabble any further in finance.

Predator

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

Ever run over a squirrel or a raccoon with your car? Do you remember musing at the time that that little critter was alive and sentient and then suddenly it wasn’t and being a little sad about it. Sarah Palin doesn’t get sad about that sort of thing. Rather, she gets a thrill when she ends the life of an animal, and the thrill is bigger when the animal is bigger. Given the joy with which she kills, do you think she’d hesitate to shoot and skin you if you gave her half a reason?

Maybe she would, but Palin and McCain are definitely billing themselves as unapologetic predators, she an enthusiastic killer of wild animals and he a heroic terminator of people who happened to be under the bombs he dropped on Viet Nam. They and their supporters revel in the superior status the power of life and death confers, and you could see it on the cruel, pallid faces and hear it in the ecstatic drawling voices on display in St. Paul.

Republicans square this somehow with a belief in the divinity of Christ, who was not known for his prowess as a hunter or as a soldier. This exposes Republicans as hypocrites and their piety as a sham, but never mind: Jesus is OK with war now, and he will save the warriors when the final reckoning comes, and it’s coming soon.

According to some public opinion polls, from the average American’s point of view, if you’re not a predator, you’re prey, and this explains all the Republican strutting. When all else fails, when your candidate has a face like a sphincter, act tough, and put some religious conviction behind it.

A person would have to be fairly gullible to believe that Jesus changed his views on violence since he expired on the cross, but that’s what they’re selling, and the mass media, at least, say people are buying it. We’ll have to wait for the end of the world to see who goes to heaven and who doesn’t, but many believe that the meek and unarmed will have an advantage at that point that they definitely don’t have now.

Obama could easily fall into the macho trap that Palin and McCain have set. We’ve seen him bare his figurative teeth in the past and we’ve seen him flex his figurative muscles so as not to be mistaken for prey. His aggressive positions on Afghanistan and Iran are examples of predatory posturing.

I hope Obama saw that clip on YouTube in which a herd of water buffalo stood up to a pride of lions. The tasty ungulates were bigger and more numerous, and the one the lions were trying to eat finally got away, with a couple of lions getting thoroughly roughed up by stronger members of the herd. If Obama keeps up his predator act, he could get beat up and maybe eaten.

Denvercrats: Nominee’s Skin Color Makes History

Friday, August 29th, 2008

Democrats think they’ve redeemed their party by nominating somebody whose skin is slightly darker than average. They haven’t. On important issues, Democrats are but a slight improvement over Republicans, with whom they will promptly sell out after the election. That’s because people with money buy Republicans and Democrats alike, and they ask only for the preservation of the economic and political status quo. Easy enough. Make changes at the margins and pretend you’ve accomplished something. Democrats have been doing this for years.

If you’re in love with Obama or Democrats, keep in mind that their “plan” to win the undeclared war in Afghanistan is based on the belief that presidents have the power to wage war on behalf of the nation. They don’t. Waging war without formal legislative approval is a form of tyranny, and our Constitution checks tyranny in every possible way. Democrats and Republicans agree that these constitutional prohibitions are obsolete and that the president has and should have the power to move soldiers around like chess pieces.

Somebody I know as a pacifist has fallen in love with Obama and now believes that there is justification to continue the bloodshed in Afghanistan. I was shocked. Are there civil libertarians for Obama who think he will promptly release the innocents confined without legal process by our government? Do any of my Obama-worshipping Quaker friends doubt that Obama will appoint federal judges and federal prosecutors who believe in the efficacy of the death penalty? He certainly holds that belief, and so must the people who cheered him in Denver.

Change at the margins is all this party promises. The crooks who don’t remain in office will walk confidently away from our devastated goverment to take positions in industry, buying and selling the influence we stupidly conferred on them. The rich will certainly get richer, and the poor will get poorer, and the world’s wealth will concentrate within an ever-contracting circle. Obama promises this, and so does McCain, and Democrats and Republicans can be depended on to deliver it by shrewd action and inaction.

Wake Up, Dennis!

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

“Wake up, America!” says Dennis Kucinich to a packed convention hall as he pleads for peace, justice and principle. Wake up, Dennis! Open your eyes, and you must discern a bought crowd and a bought party.

Wake up, Dennis, and ask yourself what these Democrats are all so happy about. They should be standing in silence in observance of the sorry state of our country. They choose the nation’s leaders, and they have nothing to celebrate. They should be plotting a solution to the mess we’ve got ourselves into, but they’re patting themselves on the back. You won’t hear a word from them about our bombing of civilians in other countries, about the catastrophe that looms unless we stop burning fuel, about the debt our grandchildren will have to bear because of our foolish national adventures, or about anything except how to win.

Wake up, Dennis, and you’ll observe that this ain’t the salt of the earth you’re talking to. This party courts the same interests as the other party. “Who’s paying for this convention?” you might well ask when you wake up. This party coddles a “faction” that sides with the other party on critical issues, to ensure that the policy of the other party, and the policy of the rich patrons who are paying for both conventions, is the policy of the nation.

Wake up, Dennis, and you might hear the catch in the voice of the self-described “progressives” dotting the audience. I heard some left-wing radio personalities gloating over their presence at the convention. A couple of well-placed members of Congress had talked to them, and they were star-struck. They’re so pleased, Dennis, that the party allowed you to make a speech, as if they actually believed any of your demands had even the slightest chance of being met.

Wake up, Dennis, and ask whether this party will stop the wars, all of them. Will they recompense the displaced and dispossessed of New Orleans? Or punish felons in government? Or promise food, shelter, and health care for all? Or restrain corporate political power? Or end the brutal oppression and exploitation of the poor by the rich? Or find out what really happened on 9/11/2001?

Wake up, Dennis, and ask whether this fat, happy crowd, browsing at the buffet tables of notorious international racketeers like ATT and Coca-Cola, really cares what ordinary people want. Do they care about peace, justice, and principle, or are they just out for a good time?